Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding the logTimeFormat value for time formatting in the KEDA Operator #41

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 22, 2020

Conversation

tbickford
Copy link
Contributor

This allows for adjusting the zap-time-encoding argument to the KEDA Operator so that time formats like ISO8601 can be used. ISO8601 is more reader-friendly when examining the timestamps in the logs and possibly could be used as the default value in the values.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Travis Bickford <tbickford@shutterstock.com>
@tbickford tbickford force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 09a1a9c to d1f6d34 Compare April 19, 2020 18:35
@zroubalik
Copy link
Member

@tbickford thanks, this is great. Could you please open another PR in kedacore/keda repo to add this change there as well?

@zroubalik
Copy link
Member

We should fix this #42 before mergin this PR, to include you change to the latest v.1.4 release.

Copy link
Contributor

@ahmelsayed ahmelsayed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tbickford, though as @zroubalik mentioned lets wait on the chart version fix then take this change.

keda/Chart.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

For the rest it looks good to me, thanks!

@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

@tbickford tbickford force-pushed the master branch 6 times, most recently from f88e03b to fd12f44 Compare April 21, 2020 21:44
Signed-off-by: Travis Bickford <tbickford@shutterstock.com>
@tbickford
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomkerkhove Thanks for the link.

@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove merged commit b9ae333 into kedacore:master Apr 22, 2020
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

My pleasure, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants